| This article has been：browse 5186times Download 1505times |
Scan the code！ |
|
|
| 镰序竹属与悬竹属叶的比较解剖 |
|
杨赵平1,2, 杜 凡1*, 彭 芸1, 丁 涛3
|
|
1.西南林学院 资源学院, 昆明 650224;2.塔里木大学 植科院, 新疆 阿拉尔 843300;3. 广西壮族自治区
中国科学院 广西植物研究所, 广西 桂林 541006
|
|
| 摘要: |
| 应用光学显微镜观察了镰序竹属与悬竹属共10个种叶的横切面和表皮结构,对分类学上有争议的种的分类地位进行探讨。结果表明:(1)镰序竹属与悬竹属叶的结构差异较大,应单独立属;(2)羊竹子、巴竹、冕宁镰序竹及碟环竹叶的结构与镰序竹属各种相近,它们应归于镰序竹属;(3)扫把竹的形态和解剖特征与镰序竹属各种差异显著,不宜放入镰序竹属,而应恢复到箭竹属中。 |
| 关键词: 镰序竹属 悬竹属 竹叶 比较解剖 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:S795.1 |
| Fund project: |
|
| Comparative anatomy of leave of genus Drepanostachyum and Ampelocalamus |
|
YANG Zhao- Ping1,2, DU Fan1*, PENG Yun1, DING Tao3
|
|
1.Faculty of Resources, Southweast Forestry College, Kunming 650224, China;2.Institute of Plants and
Technology, Tarim University, Alar 843300, China;3.Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi
Zhuang Autonomous Region and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, China
|
| Abstract: |
| After examining the cross section of leaf and leaf epidermis of 10 species of genus Drepanostachyum and Ampelocalamus applying optical microscope,and probed the position of disputed species and concluded:(1)the anatomical structures of Drepanostachyum and Ampelocalamus are different obviously,so they should be separated to be 2 genara;(2)the anatomical characters of D.saxatile,D.yongshanensis,D.mianningensis and A.patellaris are more close to that of Drepanostachyum and they should belong to Drepanostachyum;(3)the morphologic and anatomical characters of D.fractiflexum are different dramatically from that of Drepanostachyum and it should belong to Fargesia. |
| Key words: Drepanostachyum Ampelocalamus bamboo leaf comparative anatomy |
