• 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • Home
  • About Journal
  • Editorial Board
    The 8th Editorial Board of Guihaia
    The Previous Editorial Boards of Guihaia
  • Subscription
  • For Authors
    Contact Us
    Writing Guideline
    Submission Guideline
  • Open Access
  • Ethcis Statement
  • Chinese
Cite this article:[Click copy]
[Click copy]
【Print this page】   【Download PDF full text】   【View/Add Comment】  【Download reader】  【 Close 】
←Previous|Next→ Archive     Advanced search
This article has been:browse 9180times   Download 2989times 本文二维码信息
Scan the code!
Share to: WeChat More
Script:Enlarge+|Default|Narrow-
药用植物艾纳香基因组DNA提取方法研究
庞玉新1,2, 王文全1*, 张影波2,3, 刘国道2, 莫廷辉3
1.北京中医药大学 中药学院, 北京 100102;2.中国热带农业科学院 热带作物品种 资源研究所, 海南 儋州 571737;3.海南大学 农学院, 海南 儋州 571737
摘要:
以药用植物艾纳香为研究对象,以-20 ℃保存、4 ℃保存、室温自然干燥和硅胶干燥四种样品保存方式,并采用SDS法、CTAB法、SDS-CTAB法和改良CTAB法4种不同的基因组DNA提取方法进行了对比试验,以期建立艾纳香的较好的样品保存方法和基因组DNA提取方法。结果表明,-20 ℃保存是艾纳香的较理想的样品保存方式; 改良CTAB法是艾纳香基因组DNA提取较适宜的方法,该方法提取的DNA经紫外检测,其A260/A280为1.8左右,明显优于SDS法(1.1~1.5)、CTAB法(1.2~1.5)和SDS-CTAB法(1.4~1.6),琼脂糖凝胶电泳、酶切检测和PCR扩增也得出了同样的结论。
关键词:  艾纳香  基因组DNA  提取  方法
DOI:
分类号:Q943
Fund project:
Method of genomic DNA extraction of the herb Blumea balsamifera
PANG Yu-Xin1,2, WANG Wen-Quan1*, ZHANG Ying-Bo2,3, LIU Guo-Dao 2, MO Ting-Hui3
1.College of Chinese Medical Sciences, Beijing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100102, China;2.China Tropical Crops Genetic Resources Institute of Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, Danzhou 571737, China;3.College of Agriculture, Hainan University, Danzhou 571737, China
Abstract:
The paper dealt with setting up a more suitable sample preservation way and genomic DNA extraction method for Blumea balsamifera by comparing and analysing four sample preservation ways(preserved at -20 ℃,preserved at 4 ℃,natural drying and silica gel drying)and extraction methods(SDS,CTAB,SDS-CTAB,and modified of CTAB). The results showed that -20 ℃ was a better way for sample preservation and the modified CTAB method was a better method for DNA extraction than others. The UV detection value of A260/A280 was 1.7-1.8 for DNA extracted by this modified CTAB method,obviously higher than that of others,such as 1.1-1.5 for SDS method,1.2-1.5 for CTAB method,1.4-1.6 for SDS-CTAB method. The agarose electrophoresis,restriction endonuclease digestion detection and PCR amplification also indicated that the modified of CTAB method was better than others.
Key words:  Blumea balsamifera  genomic DNA  extraction  method
桂ICP备05007876号-3
Adress:Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 85, Yanshan Street, Yanshan District, Guilin, Guangxi, China   Editorial Office of Guihaia,Postal code: Tel/Fax:0773-3550074
E-mail:guihaia@vip.163.com;guihaia@126.com;guihaia@gxib.cn   website:www.guihaia-journal.com
Technology:Beijing Qinyun Science and Technology Development Co., Ltd.