| 引用本文: | 布仁巴音, 徐广平, 段吉闯, 常小峰, 张振华, 汪诗平.青藏高原高寒草甸初级生产力及其主要影响因素[J].广西植物,2010,(6):760-769.[点击复制] |
| Burenbayin, XU Guang-Ping, DUAN Ji-Chuang,
CHANG Xiao-Feng, ZHANG Zhen-Hua, WANG Shi-Ping.Primary productivity and its main affecting factors of Alpine meadows on the Tibetan plateau[J].Guihaia,2010,(6):760-769.[点击复制] |
|
| |
|
|
| 本文已被：浏览 4837次 下载 1527次 |
码上扫一扫！ |
|
|
| 青藏高原高寒草甸初级生产力及其主要影响因素 |
|
布仁巴音1,4, 徐广平2, 段吉闯1,4, 常小峰1,4, 张振华1,4, 汪诗平3*
|
|
1.中国科学院 西北高原生物研究所 高原生物适应与进化重点实验室, 西宁 810008;2. 广西壮族自治区
中国科学院 广西植物研究所,
广西 桂林 541006;3.中国科学院 青藏高原研究所, 北京 100085;4.中国科学院 研究生院, 北京 100049
|
|
| 摘要: |
| 青藏高原有各类天然草地14×108 hm2,其中高寒草甸和高寒灌丛约占青藏高原天然草地面积的50%,占全国草地总面积的16.2%。嵩草草甸是高寒草甸的主体,包括矮嵩草草甸、金露梅灌丛草甸、藏嵩草草甸、小嵩草草甸和高山嵩草草甸等,这5类高寒草甸平均地上生物量分别为354.2、422.4、445.1、227.3和368.5 g/m2,地下生物量分别为3 389.6、3 548.3、11 922.7、4 439.3、5 604.8 g/m2,地下与地上生物量的比例分别为10.55、10.15、27.82、14.82和15.21,远大于IPCC(2006)报告中地下/地上生物量比例的默认值(2.8±95%)。地下生物量对气候变化和放牧的反应比地上生物量更敏感,干旱和重度放牧均降低了地下/地上生物量的比例。在极度退化状态下地下/地上生物量的比例<2。对于轻度和中度退化的高寒草甸应以围封禁牧为主要恢复措施,但如果结合补播和施肥,则恢复速率会加快; 对于重度和极度退化的高寒草甸,由于草地植物群落中优良牧草的比例极低,仅靠自然恢复很难进行恢复或需要的年限很长,所以必须采用人工重建的措施,并结合毒杂草防除和施肥等措施进行恢复,通过建立人工或半人工草地的措施予以重建。 |
| 关键词: 高寒草甸 初级生产力 放牧 气候变化 退化草甸恢复 |
| DOI： |
| 分类号:Q948 |
| 基金项目: |
|
| Primary productivity and its main affecting factors of Alpine meadows on the Tibetan plateau |
|
Burenbayin1,4, XU Guang-Ping2, DUAN Ji-Chuang1,4,
CHANG Xiao-Feng1,4, ZHANG Zhen-Hua1,4, WANG Shi-Ping3*
|
|
1.Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Haibei Alpine Meadow Ecosystem Research Station, Northwest
Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China;2.Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang
Autonomous Region and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, China;3.Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research,Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China;4.Graduate University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
1.Key Laboratory of Adaptation and Evolution of Plateau Biota, Haibei Alpine Meadow Ecosystem Research Station, Northwest
Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China; 2.Guangxi Institute of Botany, Guangxi Zhuang
Autonomous Region and the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guilin 541006, China; 3.Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research,Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China; 4.Graduate University, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
|
| Abstract: |
| Alpine meadows and shrublands are approximately 7×108 hm2 which is about 50% of the natural grasslands on the Tibtean plateau and accounts for about 16.2% of the total grassland area in China. Alpine meadow is dominated by Kobresia meadow,including K.humilis meadow,Potentilla fruticosa shrub meadow,Kobresia tibetica meadow,K.parva meadow and K.pygmaea meadow. The average aboveground biomass of the five meadows was 354.2,422.4,445.1,227.3 and 368.5 g/m2,respectively,while the belowground biomass of 0-40 or 0-50 cm soil depth was 3 389.6,3 548.3,11 922.7,4 439.3 and 5 604.8 g/m2,respectively. Their ratios of belowground and aboveground biomass were 10.55,10.15,27.82,14.82 and 15.21 respectively,which were much higher than that of the default value(2.8±95%)recommended by IPCC(2006). The belowground biomass or belowground net primary productivity was more sensitive to the climate change and heavy grazing than above-grassland biomass did. Drought and heavy grazing decreased the ratio of belowground to aboveground biomass,even its value was less than 2 under extreme degradation conditions. Natural restoration is possible for light or moderate degraded alpine meadow for 3-8 years. However,it should be re-constructed for heavy or extreme degraded alpine meadow due to soil quality decrease and poison plant species and weeds invasion. |
| Key words: alpine meadow primary productivity grazing climate change restoration of degraded alpine meadow |
|
|
|
|
|
