• 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 网站首页
  • 期刊介绍
  • 编委会
    第八届编辑委员会
    历届编辑委员会
  • 审稿专家
    致谢2025年度为本刊审稿的各位专家!
    致谢2024年度为本刊审稿的各位专家!
    致谢2023年度为本刊审稿的各位专家!
    致谢2022年度为本刊审稿的各位专家!
    致谢2021年为本刊审稿的各位同行专家!
    致谢2020年为本刊审稿的各位同行专家!
    致谢2019年为本刊审稿的各位同行专家!
    致谢2018年为本刊审稿的各位同行专家!
    致谢2017年为本刊审稿的各位同行专家!
    致谢2016年为本刊审稿的各位同行专家!
    致谢2015年为本刊审稿的各位同行专家!
    致谢2014年为本刊审稿的各位同行专家!
    致谢2013年为本刊审稿的各位同行专家!
    致谢2012年为本刊审稿的各位同行专家!
    致谢2011年为本刊审稿的各位同行专家!
    致谢2010年为本刊审稿的各位同行专家!
  • 期刊订阅
  • 作者指南
    投稿须知
    写作指南
    联系我们
  • 出版规范
  • 开放获取
  • 论文自检
  • English
引用本文:刘 茂, 徐 雪, 罗 娅, 杨胜天, 石春茂, 赵 爽, 廖梦垚.全球世界自然遗产地的空间分布及潜力区筛选建议[J].广西植物,2024,44(8):1495-1511.[点击复制]
LIU Mao, XU Xue, LUO Ya, YANG Shengtian, SHI Chunmao, ZHAO Shuang, LIAO Mengyao.Spatial distribution of global world natural heritage sites and suggestions for screening potential areas[J].Guihaia,2024,44(8):1495-1511.[点击复制]
【打印本页】   【下载PDF全文】   【查看/发表评论】  【下载PDF阅读器】  【关闭】
←前一篇|后一篇→ 过刊浏览    高级检索
本文已被:浏览 5444次   下载 3053次 本文二维码信息
码上扫一扫!
分享到: 微信 更多
字体:加大+|默认|缩小-
全球世界自然遗产地的空间分布及潜力区筛选建议
刘 茂1,2, 徐 雪1,2, 罗 娅1,2*, 杨胜天3,4, 石春茂1,2, 赵 爽1,2, 廖梦垚1,2
1. 贵州师范大学 地理与环境科学学院, 贵阳 550025;2. 贵州省喀斯特山地生态环境国家重点实验室培育基地, 贵阳 550025;3. 贵州师范大学 生态文明学院, 贵阳 550025;4. 北京师范大学 水科学研究院, 北京 100875
摘要:
世界自然遗产地对于保护生物多样性至关重要。然而,当前世界自然遗产地对生物多样性保护的贡献与差距仍不明晰。为此,该文分析了世界自然遗产地数量和面积的时空变化特征,并识别了当前世界自然遗产地在全球生物多样性重要分布区中的保护空缺,旨在为未来筛选世界自然遗产地潜力区提供参考。结果表明:(1)截至2021年7月,世界自然遗产地共257项,有189项以保护生物多样性为主要目的被列入到名录中,占总数的73.54%。(2)在189项以保护生物多样性为目的的世界遗产地中,有80项分布在16个生物多样性超级丰富的国家; 89项分布在全球30个生物多样性热点区内; 134项分布在全球关键生物多样性区; 170项分布在12个植被生物群落中。(3)世界自然遗产地数量的空间分布差异主要受到自然环境、经济发展水平、人口分布等因素的共同影响。(4)世界自然遗产地为生物多样性保护作出了重要贡献但仍存在空缺。未来可从3个方向考虑世界遗产地的申报,即列入类别上可扩展不可再生地质类遗址与生物多样性世界遗产地的名单,生物多样性保护上对未受到保护的优先区予以重视并增强有效性保护,地理分布上加强代表性不足的遗址分布数量。以上研究成果对于指导探寻那些具有独特生物多样价值但还尚未列入世界自然遗产保护的区域有重要参考价值。
关键词:  世界自然遗产地,自然保护地,生物多样性,潜力区,影响因素
DOI:10.11931/guihaia.gxzw202307030
分类号:Q948
文章编号:1000-3142(2024)08-1495-17
基金项目:国家自然科学基金委员会-贵州省人民政府喀斯特科学研究中心项目(U1812401); 贵州省普通高等学校科技拔尖人才支持计划(黔教合KY [2018]042); 贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合支撑 [2020]4Y016); 贵州省2019年度哲学社会科学规划重点课题(19GZZD07)。
Spatial distribution of global world natural heritage sites and suggestions for screening potential areas
LIU Mao1,2, XU Xue1,2, LUO Ya1,2*, YANG Shengtian3,4, SHI Chunmao1,2, ZHAO Shuang1,2, LIAO Mengyao1,2
1. School of Geography and Environmental Science, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China;2. Cultivation Base of State Key Laboratory of Karst Mountain Ecology and Environment of Guizhou Province, Guiyang 550025, China;3. School of Ecological Civilization, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550025, China;4. Institute of Water Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Abstract:
World natural heritage sites are crucial for the conservation of biodiversity. However, the current contribution and gaps of world natural heritage sites to biodiversity conservation remain unclear. To this end, we analyzed the spatial and temporal characteristics of the changes in the number and area of world natural heritage sites, and identified the current conservation gaps of world natural heritage sites in the globally important distribution areas of biodiversity, aimed to provide a reference for future screening of potential areas for world natural heritages sites. The results were as follows:(1)As of July 2021, there were a total of 257 world natural heritage sites, 189 of which had been inscribed on list with the primary purpose of conserving biodiversity, accounting for 73.54% of the total.(2)Of the 189 world heritage sites whose main purpose was the conservation of biodiversity, 80 were located in 16 super-rich biodiversity countries, 89 were located in 30 global biodiversity hotspots, 134 were located in global key biodiversity areas, and 170 were located in 12 vegetation biomes.(3)The differences in the spatial distribution of the number of world natural heritage sites were mainly influenced by the combination of factors such as the natural environment, the level of economic development and population distribution.(4)World natural heritage sites made an important contribution to biodiversity conservation but there were still gaps. In the future, the declaration of world heritage sites can be considered in three directions, those are expanding the list of non-renewable geological sites and biodiversity world heritage sites for inclusion in the categories, emphasizing and enhancing the effectiveness of the protection of unprotected priority areas for biodiversity conservation, and strengthening the distribution of under-represented sites in terms of geographic distribution. The results of the above research will be an important reference for guiding the search for areas of unique biodiversity value that have not yet been inscribed for world natural heritage protection.
Key words:  world natural heritage sites, nature reserves, biodiversity, potential area, influencing factors
桂ICP备05007876号-3
地址:广西桂林市雁山区雁山街85号 广西壮族自治区中国科学院广西植物研究所  《广西植物》编辑部,邮编:541006 电话:0773-3550074
E-mail:guihaia@vip.163.com(投稿系统);guihaia@126.com(稿件处理);guihaia@gxib.cn(业务联系)  网址:http://www.guihaia-journal.com
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司