Page 156 - 《广西植物》2022年第3期
P. 156

5 0 0                                 广  西  植  物                                         42 卷
   NIU SQꎬ JING CHꎬ LIAO SQꎬ et al.ꎬ 2013. Bacterial    17(6): 2401-2406.]
     population structure diversity in saline ̄alkali soil in Hexi  WANG JLꎬ HAN NNꎬ FENG WZꎬ et al.ꎬ 2018. Summary of
     corridor [J]. J N Norm Univ(Nat Sci Ed)ꎬ 49(2): 90-  research on engineering technology and equipment for soda
     95. [牛世全ꎬ 景彩虹ꎬ 廖世齐ꎬ 等ꎬ 2013. 河西走廊盐碱                saline ̄alkali soil remediation in Northeast China [J]. Agric
     土细菌种群结构多样性的研究 [J]. 西北师范大学学报                        Technolꎬ 38(23): 1-4. [王景立ꎬ 韩楠楠ꎬ 冯伟志ꎬ 等ꎬ
     (自然科学版)ꎬ 49(2): 90-95.]                            2018. 东北苏打盐碱地整治工程技术与装备研究综述
   PAN YYꎬ 2018. Study on the response mechanism of the growth  [J]. 农业与技术ꎬ 38(23): 1-4.]
     physiological characteristics of Pennisetum giganteum z.x.Lin  WU ZZꎬ MA Mꎬ ZHANG XLꎬ et al.ꎬ 2016. Effects of licorice
     to salt ̄alkali mixed stress [ D]. Hohhot: Inner Mongolia  on soil physical and chemical properties and soil enzyme
     Agricultural University: 25-29. [潘羿壅ꎬ 2018. 巨菌草生   activities in saline ̄alkali soils in Xinjiang [J]. J Agricꎬ 6
     长生理特性对盐碱混合胁迫的响应机制研究 [D]. 呼和                        (6): 24-29. [吴振振ꎬ 马淼ꎬ 张旭龙ꎬ 2016. 甘草对新疆
     浩特: 内蒙古农业大学: 25-29.]                               盐碱地土壤理化性质及土壤酶活性的影响 [J]. 农学学
   PAUL FKꎬ JOSEPHINE YAꎬ 2004. Bacterial diversity in  报ꎬ 6(6): 24-29.]
     aquatic and other environments: what 16s rdna libraries can  XIE XCꎬ ZHANG SHꎬ WANG DSꎬ et al.ꎬ 2007. Eco ̄
     tell us [J]. Fems Microbiol Ecolꎬ 47(2): 161-177.  toxlcological effects of abamectin on vegetable ̄growing soil
   PETRIC Iꎬ PHILIPPOT Lꎬ ABBATE Cꎬ et al.ꎬ 2011. Inter ̄  microorganisms and enzymes activity [J]. Acta Pedol Sinꎬ
     laboratory evaluation of the ISO standard 11063 “ Soil  44(4): 740-743.
     quality ̄method to directly extract DNA from soil samples”  XUE Dꎬ YAO HYꎬ HE ZLꎬ et al.ꎬ 2005. Relationships between
     [J]. J Microbiol Methodꎬ 84(3): 454-460.           red soil enzyme activity and fertility [J]. Chin J Appl Ecolꎬ
   PENG Lꎬ YANG YFꎬ HOU YMꎬ et al.ꎬ 2014. The biosafety  16( 8): 1455 - 1458. [ 薛 冬ꎬ 姚 槐 应ꎬ 何 振 立ꎬ 等ꎬ
     assessment of introduced Pennisetum sp. in Fujian Provinceꎬ  2005. 红壤酶活性与肥力的关系 [J]. 应用生态学报ꎬ
     China [J]. Fujian J Agric Sciꎬ 29(11): 1132-1137. [彭  16(8): 1455-1458.]
     露ꎬ 杨 一 帆ꎬ 侯 有 明ꎬ 等ꎬ 2014. 福 建 省 引 种 巨 菌 草       YAN CSꎬ 1988. Soil fertility research methods [M]. Beijing:
     Pennisetum sp. 的生物安全性评价 [J]. 福建农业学报ꎬ               Agricultural Press: 234-286. [严昶升ꎬ 1988. 土壤肥力研
     29(11): 1132-1137.]                                究方法 [M]. 北京: 农业出版社: 234-286.]
   SHI  Wꎬ  2011.  Screening  and  resistance ̄analysis  of  YAN LMꎬ GUO XQꎬ 2017. Effects of salt ̄alkali stress on soil
     microorganism in extreme saline ̄alkaline soil [D]. Harbin:  enzyme activities in the rhizosphere of Cinnamomum
     Northeast Forestry University: 32-33. [石伟ꎬ 2011. 极端盐  camphora seedlings [J]. Soilsꎬ 49(4): 733-737. [颜路明ꎬ
     碱土壤细菌的分离筛选及抗盐特性研究 [D]. 哈尔滨:                        郭祥泉ꎬ 2017. 盐碱胁迫对香樟幼苗根际土壤酶活性的影
     东北林业大学: 32-33.]                                    响 [J]. 土壤ꎬ 49(4): 733-737.]
   SUSAN MHꎬ DAVID MWꎬ HILARY GMꎬ et al.ꎬ 2010. Ironing  YANG XJꎬ LIAO CYꎬ LI XMꎬ et al.ꎬ 2013. Path analysis of
     out the wrinkles in therare biosphere through improved OTU  soil enzyme activity and soil chemical properties of Pinus
     clustering [J]. Environ Microbiolꎬ 12(7): 1889-1898.  sylvestris forest in Yulin sandy area [J]. J Arid Land Resour
   TANG Jꎬ DIAN ZYꎬ WANG HLꎬ et al.ꎬ 2016. Assessment of  Environꎬ 27(9): 109-112. [杨晓娟ꎬ 廖超英ꎬ 李晓明ꎬ
     soil fertility of continuous plantation of Cunninghamia  等ꎬ 2013. 榆林沙区樟子松林土壤酶活性与土壤化学性质
     lanceolata in main producing regions in Guangxi [J]. J For  的通径分析 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境ꎬ 27(9): 109-112.]
     Environꎬ 36(1): 30-35. [唐健ꎬ 覃祚玉ꎬ 王会利ꎬ 等ꎬ        YE WYꎬ XIE XZꎬ XU YYꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. High ̄throughput
     2016. 广西杉木主产区连栽杉木林地土壤肥力综合评价                        sequencing analysis of fungal community in rhizosphere soils
     [J]. 森林与环境学报ꎬ 36(1): 30-35.]                       of two plants formushroon cultivation (JUNCAO) [J]. Chin
   TIAN Qꎬ GAO DMꎬ LI Hꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. Effects of wheat root  J Trop Cropꎬ 41(3): 556-563. [叶文雨ꎬ 谢序泽ꎬ 许钰
     exudates on the structure of fungi community in continuous  滢ꎬ 等ꎬ 2020. 基于高通量测序技术分析 2 种菌草根际土
     cropping watermelon soil [ J]. Chin Agric Sciꎬ 53 ( 5):  壤真 菌 群 落 多 样 性 [ J]. 热 带 作 物 学 报ꎬ 41 ( 3):
     1018-1028. [田晴ꎬ 高丹美ꎬ 李慧ꎬ 等ꎬ 2020. 小麦根系分            556-563.]
     泌物对西瓜连作土壤真菌群落结构的影响 [J]. 中国农                     YOU YMꎬ WANG Jꎬ HUANG XMꎬ et al.ꎬ 2014. Relating
     业科学ꎬ 53(5): 1018-1028.]                            microbial community structure to functioning in forest soil
   TU SXꎬ SUN JHꎬ GUO ZFꎬ et al.ꎬ 2000. On relationship  organic carbon transformation and turnover [ J ]. Ecol
     between root exudates and plant nutrition in rhizosphere  Environꎬ 4(5): 1-15.
     [J]. Soil Environ Sciꎬ 9(1): 64-67. [涂书新ꎬ 孙锦荷ꎬ  ZHANG PHꎬ HOU XDꎬ WANG Jꎬ 2017. Causes and
     郭智芬ꎬ 等ꎬ 2000. 植物根系分泌物与根际营养关系评述                     amelioration measures of saline ̄alkali land in Xinjiang region
     [J]. 土壤与环境ꎬ 9(1): 64-67.]                          [J]. Mod Agric Technolꎬ 4(24): 178-180. [张鹏辉ꎬ 侯宪
   WANG Hꎬ WANG Gꎬ HUANG YYꎬ et al.ꎬ 2008. Effects of pH  东ꎬ 王 健ꎬ 2017. 新 疆 地 区 盐 碱 地 成 因 及 治 理 措 施
     changes on enzyme activities in acid soils [J]. Ecol Environ  [J]. 现代农业科技ꎬ 4(24): 178-180.]
     Sciꎬ 17 (6): 2401 - 2406. [ 王 涵ꎬ 王 果ꎬ 黄 颖 颖ꎬ 等ꎬ
     2008. pH 变化对酸性土壤酶活性的影响 [J]. 生态环境ꎬ                                             (责任编辑  周翠鸣)
   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161