Page 42 - 《广西植物》2025年第3期
P. 42

4 2 2                                  广  西  植  物                                         45 卷
               transformation [C] / / 8th International Mycological Congress  复中的应用 [J]. 微生物学报ꎬ 63(5): 1930-1943.]
               of the International Mycological Association ( IMC8 ).  DENG CJꎬ YUAN Fꎬ BU TDꎬ et al.ꎬ 2022. Influence of soil
               Cairns: International Mycological Association: 275.  fauna on litter decomposition in central Guizhou karst forest
            BERG Bꎬ 2014. Decomposition patterns for foliar litter — A  [J]. Forest Researchꎬ 35(3): 72-81. [邓承佳ꎬ 袁访ꎬ 卜
               theory for influencing factors [ J ]. Soil Biology &  通达ꎬ 等ꎬ 2022. 土壤动物对黔中地区喀斯特森林凋落物
               Biochemistryꎬ 78: 222-232.                        分解的影响 [J]. 林业科学研究ꎬ 35(3): 72-81.]
            BERG Bꎬ EKBOHM Gꎬ 1991. Litter mass loss rates and  DE ALENCAR MIGꎬ BELO Aꎬ SILVA JLAꎬ et al.ꎬ 2022. Hard
               decomposition patterns in some needle and leaf litter  to predict! No clear effects of home ̄field advantage on leaf
               types. Long ̄term decomposition in a Scots pine forest Ⅶ  litter decomposition in tropical heath vegetation [J]. Journal
               [J]. Canadian Journal of Botanyꎬ 69(7): 1449-1456.  of Tropical Ecologyꎬ 38: 462-471.
            BONAN GBꎬ 2008. Forests and climate change: Forcingsꎬ  FANIN Nꎬ FROMIN Nꎬ BERTRAND Iꎬ 2016. Functional
               feedbacksꎬ and the climate benefits of forests [J]. Scienceꎬ  breadth and home ̄field advantage generate functional
               320(5882): 1444-1449.                             differences among soil microbial decomposers [J]. Ecologyꎬ
            BORER ETꎬ BRACKEN MESꎬ SEABLOOM EWꎬ et al.ꎬ          97(4): 1023-1037.
               2013. Global biogeography of autotroph chemistry: Is  FANIN Nꎬ LIN DMꎬ FRESCHET GTꎬ et al.ꎬ 2021. Home ̄field
               insolation  a  driving  force?  [ J ].  Oikosꎬ 122(8):  advantage of litter decomposition: From the phyllosphere to
               1121-1130.                                        the soil [J]. New Phytologistꎬ 231(4): 1353-1358.
            BRADFORD MAꎬ BERG Bꎬ MAYNARD DSꎬ et al.ꎬ 2016.     FENG YZꎬ ZHANG JWꎬ BERDUGO Mꎬ et al.ꎬ 2022.
               Understanding the dominant controls on litter decomposition  Temperature thresholds drive the global distribution of soil
               [J]. Journal of Ecologyꎬ 104(1): 229-238.         fungal decomposers [ J]. Global Change Biologyꎬ 28(8):
            BRANDT LAꎬ KING JYꎬ MILCHUNAS DGꎬ 2007. Effects of   2779-2789.
               ultraviolet radiation on litter decomposition depend on  FUJII Sꎬ MAKITA Nꎬ MORI ASꎬ et al.ꎬ 2016.ꎬ Plant species
               precipitation and litter chemistry in a shortgrass steppe  control and soil faunal involvement in the processes of above ̄
               ecosystem [J]. Global Change Biologyꎬ 13(10): 2193-2205.  and below ̄ground litter decomposition [J]. Oikosꎬ 125(4):
            CARCAMO HAꎬ ABE TAꎬ PRESCOTT CEꎬ et al.ꎬ 2000.       883-892.
               Influence  of  millipedes  on  litter  decompositionꎬ  N  GALLO MEꎬ SINSABAUGH RLꎬ CABANISS SEꎬ 2006. The
               mineralizationꎬ and microbial communities in a coastal forest  role of ultraviolet radiation in litter decomposition in and
               in British Columbiaꎬ Canada [J]. Canadian Journal of Forest  ecosystems [J]. Applied Soil Ecologyꎬ 34(1): 82-91.
               Researchꎬ 30(5): 817-826.                       GAO DCꎬ BAI Eꎬ WANG SYꎬ et al.ꎬ 2022. Three ̄dimensional
            COQ Sꎬ WEIGEL Jꎬ BUTENSCHOEN Oꎬ et al.ꎬ 2011. Litter  mapping of carbonꎬ nitrogenꎬ and phosphorus in soil
               composition rather than plant presence affects decomposition  microbial biomass and their stoichiometry at the global scale
               of tropical litter mixtures [J]. Plant and Soilꎬ 343(1/ 2):  [J]. Global Change Biologyꎬ 28(22): 6728-6740.
               273-286.                                        GARCÍA ̄PALACIOS Pꎬ MAESTRE FTꎬ KATTGE Jꎬ et al.ꎬ
            CORNELISSEN JHCꎬ PEREZ ̄HARGUINDEGUY Nꎬ DIAZ Sꎬ       2013. Climate and litter quality differently modulate the
               et al.ꎬ 1999. Leaf structure and defence control litter  effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition across biomes
               decomposition rate across species and life forms in regional  [J]. Ecology Lettersꎬ 16(8): 1045-1053.
               floras on two continents [ J]. New Phytologistꎬ 143(1):  GUERREIRO MAꎬ KAMBACH Sꎬ STOLL Rꎬ et al.ꎬ 2023.
               191-200.                                          Linking processes to community functions ̄insights into litter
            COTRUFO MFꎬ WALLENSTEIN MDꎬ BOOT CMꎬ et al.ꎬ         decomposition combining fungal metatranscriptomics and
               2013. The Microbial Efficiency ̄Matrix Stabilization (MEMS)  environmental NMR profiling [ J]. Mycological Progressꎬ
               framework integrates plant litter decomposition with soil  22(2): 10.
               organic matter stabilization: Do labile plant inputs form  HATTENSCHWILER Sꎬ JORGENSEN HBꎬ 2010. Carbon
               stable soil organic matter? [ J]. Global Change Biologyꎬ  quality rather than stoichiometry controls litter decomposition
               19(4): 988-995.                                   in a tropical rain forest [J]. Journal of Ecologyꎬ 98(4):
            CUI X Wꎬ LIN XRꎬ LI JBꎬ et al.ꎬ 2023. Diversityꎬ functional  754-763.
               characteristicsꎬ and environmental remediation potential of  HEDIN LOꎬ VITOUSEK PMꎬ MATSON PAꎬ 2003. Nutrient
               stress ̄tolerant actinomycetes [ J ]. Acta Microbiologica  losses over four million years of tropical forest development
               Sinicaꎬ 63(5): 1930-1943. [崔熙雯ꎬ 林小锐ꎬ 李家兵ꎬ         [J]. Ecologyꎬ 84(9): 2231-2255.
               等ꎬ 2023. 抗逆放线菌的多样性、功能特性及其在环境修                   HEIM Aꎬ FREY Bꎬ 2004. Early stage litter decomposition rates
   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47