Page 43 - 《广西植物》2025年第3期
P. 43

3 期                     郭屹立等: 森林凋落物分解速率的影响因素研究进展                                            4 2 3

               for Swiss forests [J]. Biogeochemistryꎬ 70(3): 299-313.  2007. Soil enzyme inhibition by condensed litter tannins may
            HOBBIE SEꎬ 2015. Plant species effects on nutrient cycling:  drive ecosystem structure and processes: The case of Kalmia
               Revisiting litter feedbacks [ J ]. Trends in Ecology &  angustifolia [J]. New Phytologistꎬ 175(3): 535-546.
               Evolutionꎬ 30: 357-363.                         JOHNSON Jꎬ PANNATIER EGꎬ CARNICELLI Sꎬ et al.ꎬ
            HOBBIE SEꎬ EDDY WCꎬ BUYARSKI CRꎬ et al.ꎬ 2012.       2018. The response of soil solution chemistry in European
               Response of decomposing litter and its microbial community  forests to decreasing acid deposition [ J]. Global Change
               to multiple forms of nitrogen enrichment [ J]. Ecological  Biologyꎬ 24(8): 3603-3619.
               Monographsꎬ 82(3): 389-405.                     LIAO LPꎬ GAO Hꎬ WANG SLꎬ et al.ꎬ 2000. The effects of
            HOGBERG MNꎬ BRIONES MJIꎬ KEEL SGꎬ et al.ꎬ 2010.      nitrogen addition on soil nutrient leaching and the
               Quantification of effects of season and nitrogen supply on tree  decomposition of Chinese fir leaf litter [J]. Chinese Journal
               below ̄ground carbon transfer to ectomycorrhizal fungi and  of Plant Ecologyꎬ 24(1): 34-39. [廖利平ꎬ 高洪ꎬ 汪思
               other soil organisms in a boreal pine forest [ J]. New  龙ꎬ 等ꎬ 2000. 外加氮源对杉木叶凋落物分解及土壤养分
               Phytologistꎬ 187(2): 485-493.                     淋失的影响 [J]. 植物生态学报ꎬ 24(1): 34-39.]
            HOLDSWORTH ARꎬ FRELICH LEꎬ REICH PBꎬ 2008. Litter  KASPARI Mꎬ YANOVIAK SPꎬ 2008. Biogeography of litter
               decomposition in earthworm ̄invaded northern hardwood  depth in tropical forests: Evaluating the phosphorus growth
               forests: Role of invasion degree and litter chemistry  rate hypothesis [J]. Functional Ecologyꎬ 22(5): 919-923.
               [J]. Ecoscienceꎬ 15(4): 536-544.                KEIBLINGER KMꎬ HALL EKꎬ WANEK Wꎬ et al.ꎬ 2010. The
            HOORENS Bꎬ AERTS Rꎬ STROETENGA Mꎬ 2003. Does         effect of resource quantity and resource stoichiometry on
               initial litter chemistry explain litter mixture effects on  microbial carbon ̄use ̄efficiency [ J ]. Fems Microbiology
               decomposition? [J]. Oecologiaꎬ 137(4): 578-586.   Ecologyꎬ 73(3): 430-440.
            HOORENS Bꎬ COOMES Dꎬ AERTS Rꎬ 2010. Neighbour      KELLER ABꎬ PHILLIPS RP. 2019. Leaf litter decay rates differ
               identity hardly affects litter ̄mixture effects on decomposition  between mycorrhizal groups in temperateꎬ but not tropicalꎬ
               rates of New Zealand forest species [ J ]. Oecologiaꎬ  forests [J]. New Phytologistꎬ 222(1): 556-564.
               162(2): 479-489.                                KNORR Mꎬ FREY SDꎬ CURTIS PSꎬ 2005. Nitrogen additions
            HOSSAIN MZꎬ SUGIYAMA Sꎬ 2020. Relative importance of  and litter decomposition: A meta ̄analysis [ J]. Ecologyꎬ
               soil microbes and litter quality on decomposition and nitrogen  86(12): 3252-3257.
               cycling in grasslands [ J]. Ecological Researchꎬ 35(5):  LEROY CJꎬ MARKS JCꎬ 2006. Litter qualityꎬ stream
               912-924.                                          characteristics and litter diversity influence decomposition
            HOU SLꎬ HATTENSCHWILER Sꎬ YANG JJꎬ et al.ꎬ 2021.     rates and macroinvertebrates [ J ]. Freshwater Biologyꎬ
               Increasing rates of long ̄term nitrogen deposition consistently  51(4): 605-617.
               increased litter decomposition in a semi ̄arid grassland  LEWIS DBꎬ CASTELLANO MJꎬ KAYE JPꎬ 2014. Forest
               [J]. New Phytologistꎬ 229(1): 296-307.            successionꎬ soil carbon accumulationꎬ and rapid nitrogen
            HU PLꎬ ZHANG Wꎬ CHEN HSꎬ et al.ꎬ 2021. Soil carbon   storage in poorly remineralized soil organic matter [ J].
               accumulation with increasing temperature under both  Ecologyꎬ 95(10): 2687-2693.
               managed and natural vegetation restoration in calcareous soils  LIN DMꎬ DOU PPꎬ YANG GRꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. Home ̄field
               [J]. Science of the Total Environmentꎬ 767(1): 145298.  advantage of litter decomposition differs between leaves and
            HUANG WJꎬ HAMMEL KEꎬ HAO JLꎬ et al.ꎬ 2019.           fine roots [J]. New Phytologistꎬ 227(4): 995-1000.
               Enrichment of lignin ̄derived carbon in mineral ̄associated  LIN DMꎬ PANG Mꎬ FANIN Nꎬ et al.ꎬ 2019. Fungi participate in
               soil organic matter [ J ]. Environmental  Science &  driving home ̄field advantage of litter decomposition in a
               Technologyꎬ 53(13): 7522-7531.                    subtropical forest [J]. Plant and Soilꎬ 434(1/ 2): 467-480.
            JIANG Hꎬ PAN YTꎬ LIANG JWꎬ et al.ꎬ 2022. UV radiation  LIU CCꎬ LIU YGꎬ GUO Kꎬ et al.ꎬ 2016. Mixing litter from
               doubles microbial degradation of standing litter in a  deciduous and evergreen trees enhances decomposition in a
               subtropical forest [ J ]. Journal of Ecologyꎬ 110(9):  subtropical karst forest in southwestern China [ J]. Soil
               2156-2166.                                        Biology & Biochemistryꎬ 101: 44-54.
            JING Hꎬ WANG GLꎬ 2020. Temporal dynamics of Pinus  LIU Jꎬ LIU XYꎬ SONG QNꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. Synergistic effects: A
               tabulaeformis litter decomposition under nitrogen addition on  common  theme  in  mixed ̄species litter  decomposition
               the Loess Plateau of China [ J ]. Forest Ecology and  [J]. New Phytologistꎬ 227(3): 757-765.
               Managementꎬ 476(15): 118465.                    LIU Qꎬ LI JXꎬ YE SMꎬ et al.ꎬ 2024. Characteristics and
            JOANISSE GDꎬ BRADLEY RLꎬ PRESTON CMꎬ et al.ꎬ         hotspots of  forest  litter  decomposition  research:  A
   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48