Page 144 - 《广西植物》2025年第4期
P. 144

7 5 8                                  广  西  植  物                                         45 卷
               of  phylogeny  reconstruction  [ J ].  Systematics  and  [J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences (12): 97-101. [韩
               Biodiversityꎬ 19(4): 400-422.                     洪波ꎬ 吴英ꎬ 2019. 基于三角梅外观的种质资源评价
            CHANG SXꎬ LI CXꎬ JIANG YZꎬ et al.ꎬ 2021. Characteristics  [J]. 黑龙江农业科学 (12): 97-101.]
               of the pollen morphology and viability of Bougainvillea  HUANG HXꎬ JI HLꎬ JU Sꎬ et al.ꎬ 2022. Pantranscriptome
               (Nyctaginaceae) [J]. Scientia Horticulturaeꎬ 277: 109732.  combined with phenotypic quantification reveals germplasm
            CHEN ZZꎬ 2017. The variety resources investigation and  kinship and regulation network of bract color variation in
               cultivar classification of Bougainvillea [ D ]. Guangzhou:  Bougainvillea [J]. Frontiers in Plant Scienceꎬ 13: 1018846.
               South China Agricultural University: 14 - 15. [ 陈 炽 争ꎬ  ISLAM Sꎬ 2013. Phenotypic and ornamental attributes of rose
               2017. 三角梅属种质资源调查与品种分类的研究 [D]. 广                   (Rosa spp.) genotypes under the southern united states
               州: 华南农业大学: 14-15.]                                conditions [ J ]. Journal of Agriculture & Environmentꎬ
            CHU YXꎬ DENG Sꎬ HUANG ZCꎬ et al.ꎬ 2015. Classification  11(1): 1083-1085.
               for gerbera DUS testing quantitative traits and diversity  JOAN CMꎬ ANA RPꎬ SONIA CSꎬ et al.ꎬ 2023. Phenotypic
               analysis of morphological characteristic [J]. Journal of Plant  diversity and distinctiveness of the Belltall garlic landrace
               Genetic Resourcesꎬ 16(4): 920-926. [褚云霞ꎬ 邓姗ꎬ 黄    [J]. Frontiers in Plant Scienceꎬ 13: 1004069.
               志城ꎬ 等ꎬ 2015. 非洲菊新品种 DUS 测试数量性状分级及               JOFFARD Nꎬ BUATOIS Bꎬ ARNAL Vꎬ et al.ꎬ 2022.
               形态性状多样性研究 [J]. 植物遗传资源学报ꎬ 16(4):                   Delimiting species in the taxonomically challenging orchid
               920-926.]                                         section Pseudophrys: Bayesian analyses of genetic and
            DENG Lꎬ HAN Zꎬ 2019. Image features and DUS testing traits  phenotypic data [ J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolutionꎬ
               for peanut pod variety identification and pedigree analysis  10: 1058550.
               [J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agricultureꎬ 99(5):  LELES Bꎬ CHAVES AVꎬ RUSSO Pꎬ et al.ꎬ 2015. Genetic
               2572-2578.                                        structure is associated with phenotypic divergence in floral
            DHEEPA Rꎬ VINODKUMAR Sꎬ RENKADEVI Pꎬ et al.ꎬ         traits and reproductive investment in a high ̄altitude orchid
               2016.  Phenotypic  and  molecular  characterization  of  from the iron quadrangleꎬ southeastern Brazil [ J]. PLoS
               chrysanthemum white rust pathogen Puccinia horian (Henn)  ONEꎬ 10(3): e0120645.
               and the effect of liquid based formulation of Bacillus spp. for  LIU MJꎬ 1992. Studies on the variations and grading standards
               the management of chrysanthemum white rust under protected  of several economid characters of peach [ J]. Journal of
               cultivation [J]. Biological Controlꎬ 103: 172-186.  Beijing University of Agricultureꎬ 7(2): 98-104. [刘孟军ꎬ
            DING LPꎬ MA Lꎬ RAN YJꎬ 2020. Principal component analysis  1992. 桃树部分经济性状的种内变异及其分级标准研究
               of peony variety classification and ornamental traits [ J].  [J]. 北京农学院学报ꎬ 7(2): 98-104.]
               Forest Science and Technology (5): 32-35. [丁丽萍ꎬ 马  LIU Pꎬ FENG CHꎬ 2017. Application of grey correlative factor
               力ꎬ 冉永军ꎬ 2020. 牡丹品种分类及观赏性状的主成分分                    analysis in comprehensive evaluation a case study of

               析 [J]. 林业科技通讯 (5): 32-35.]                        comprehensive evaluation of profitability of enterprises
            EBRAHIMI Aꎬ ASADI Aꎬ MONFARED SRꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020.      [ J ]. Journal of Heilongjiang Institute of Technology
               Evaluation of phenotypic diversity of the endangered orchid  (Comprehensive Edition)ꎬ 17(9): 62-65. [刘攀ꎬ 冯长焕ꎬ
               (Orchis mascula): Emphasizing on breedingꎬ conservation  2017. 灰色关联因子分析法在综合评价中的应用———以
               and development [J]. South African Journal of Botanyꎬ 132:  企业盈利能力综合评价为例 [J]. 黑龙江工业学院学报
               304-315.                                          (综合版)ꎬ 17(9): 62-65.]
            FANOURAKIS Dꎬ BOURANIS Dꎬ TSANIKLIDIS Gꎬ et al.ꎬ   LIU Pꎬ LIU MJꎬ ZHOU JYꎬ et al.ꎬ 2003. Distribution and
               2020. Genotypic and phenotypic differences in fresh weight  probability grading index system of quantitative character of
               partitioning of cut rose stems: Implications for water loss  Chinese jujube [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicaeꎬ 39(6): 77 -
               [J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarumꎬ 42(4): 1-10.    82. [刘平ꎬ 刘孟军ꎬ 周俊义ꎬ 等ꎬ 2003. 枣树数量性状的
            HAIDER Sꎬ BASHIR MAꎬ HABIB Uꎬ et al.ꎬ 2021. Phenotypic  分布类型及其概率分级指标体系 [J]. 林业科学ꎬ 39(6):
               characterization and RT ̄qPCR analysis of flower development  77-82.]
               in F transgenics of Chrysanthemum × grandiflorum [ J].  LIU Yꎬ ANDERSON NOꎬ 2022. Phenotypic differences among
                  1
               Plants ̄Baselꎬ 10(8): 1681.                        and within extant populations of Chrysanthemum arcticum
            HAN HBꎬ WU Yꎬ 2019. Evaluation of germplasm resources  L. and C. a. subsp. arcticum [ J]. BMC Plant Biologyꎬ
               based on appearance of Bougainvillea spectabilis Willd  22(1): 517-519.
   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149