Page 118 - 《广西植物》2026年第7期
P. 118

1 2 1 4                                广  西  植  物                                         46 卷
              2020. 超氧化物歧化酶的研究进展与植物抗逆性 [J]. 植                  Zhang X Cꎬ Zhao Lꎬ Chen Yꎬ et al.ꎬ 2019. Overlooked risks
              物生理学报ꎬ 56(12): 2571-2584.]                         and influences of environmentally persistent free radicals in
            Yang J Sꎬ Yao R Jꎬ Wang X Pꎬ et al.ꎬ 2022. Research on salt ̄  the ambient media [ J ]. China Environmental Scienceꎬ
              affected soils in China: historyꎬ status quo and prospect  39(5): 2180-2189. [张绪超ꎬ 赵力ꎬ 陈懿ꎬ 等ꎬ 2019. 环境
              [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinicaꎬ 59(1): 10-27. [杨劲松ꎬ 姚  持久性自由基及其介导的生物学损伤 [J]. 中国环境科
              荣江ꎬ 王相平ꎬ 等ꎬ 2022. 中国盐渍土研究:历程、现状与                   学ꎬ 39(5): 2180-2189.]
              展望 [J]. 土壤学报ꎬ 59(1): 10-27.]                     Zhang Y Cꎬ 2022. Effects of high temperature and abscisic acid
            Yang Z Xꎬ Zheng Xꎬ Chen L Bꎬ et al.ꎬ 2022. Morphological  on heatresistance physiology of Dahlia [D]. Baoding: Hebei
              adaptation strategies of Rumex hanus planted in saline ̄alkali  Agricultural University. [张映婵ꎬ 2022. 高温及脱落酸对大
              land of arid areas [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinicaꎬ 31(7):  丽花耐热生理的影响 [D]. 保定: 河北农业大学.]
              15-27. [杨志新ꎬ 郑旭ꎬ 陈来宝ꎬ 等ꎬ 2022. 干旱区盐碱地            Zhang Y Lꎬ Hu Xꎬ Cai J Fꎬ et al.ꎬ 2021. Morphological and
              食叶草根系形态分布适应策略研究 [ J]. 草业学报ꎬ                        photosynthetic physiological characteristics of Melia azedarach
              31(7): 15-27.]                                     seedlings under Na SO and Na CO stresses [J]. Guihaiaꎬ
                                                                              2  4      2  3
            Yao M Gꎬ Wang M Qꎬ Chi Y Wꎬ 1995. Research on variety  41(2): 195- 205. [ 张 远 兰ꎬ 胡 鑫ꎬ 蔡 金 峰ꎬ 等ꎬ 2021.
              resources of dahlia [J]. Journal of Jilin Forestry Universityꎬ  Na SO 和Na CO 胁迫下苦楝幼苗的形态及光合生理特性
                                                                   2  4   2  3
              11(2): 96-99. [姚梅国ꎬ 王明启ꎬ 迟玉文ꎬ 1995. 大丽花            [J]. 广西植物ꎬ 41(2): 195-205.]
              品种资源的研究 [J]. 吉林林学院学报ꎬ 11(2): 96-99.]             Zhang Z Zꎬ Zhang Tꎬ Li Qꎬ et al.ꎬ 2017. Physiological and
            Yu B Lꎬ 2021. Remediation measures of saline ̄alkali land: A  biochemical responses of Atriplex canescens seedlings to salt
              review [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletinꎬ 37(7):  stress [ J ]. Acta Botanica Boreali ̄Occidentalia Sinicaꎬ
              81-87. [于宝勒ꎬ 2021. 盐碱地修复利用措施研究进展                   37(12): 2435-2443. [张震中ꎬ 张潭ꎬ 李倩ꎬ 等ꎬ 2017. 四
              [J]. 中国农学通报ꎬ 37(7): 81-87.]                        翅滨藜生理生化特征对盐胁迫的响应 [J]. 西北植物学
            Yuan X Fꎬ Li X Wꎬ Chen R Bꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. Effects of  报ꎬ 37(12): 2435-2443.]
              uniconazole on growth and osmotic adjustment substances of  Zhang Z Zꎬ Zhao X Yꎬ Zhang G Xꎬ et al.ꎬ 2025. Physiological
              Dahlia pinnata under drought stress and rehydration  response under saline ̄alkali stress and saline ̄alkali tolerance
              conditions [ J]. Contemporary Horticultureꎬ 43 ( 23): 9 -  evaluation of 4 species of Viola [ J]. Plant Physiology
              12. [袁先峰ꎬ 李晓婉ꎬ 陈仁彪ꎬ 等ꎬ 2020. 干旱胁迫及复                Journalꎬ 61(4): 405-414. [张忠正ꎬ 赵雪瑶ꎬ 张鸽香ꎬ 等ꎬ
              水条件下烯效唑对大丽花生长与渗透调节物质的影响                            2025. 四种堇菜属植物对盐碱胁迫的生理响应及耐盐碱
              [J]. 现代园艺ꎬ 43(23): 9-12.]                          性评价 [J]. 植物生理学报ꎬ 61(4): 405-414.]
            Zhan Z Nꎬ Ji Tꎬ 2019. Analysis of plant response mechanism to  Zhao H Xꎬ 2020. Effects of alkali stress on chlorophyll and the
              saline ̄alkali stress [J]. Seed Science & Technologyꎬ 37(2):  contents of proline and soluble sugar in rice [J]. Crops (1):
              113. [詹振楠ꎬ 纪婷ꎬ 2019. 探析植物对盐碱胁迫的响应                  98-102. [赵海新ꎬ 2020. 碱胁迫对水稻叶绿素及叶片脯氨
              机制 [J]. 种子科技ꎬ 37(2): 113.]                         酸和可溶性糖含量的影响 [J]. 作物杂志(1): 98-102.]
            Zhang Hꎬ Su B Nꎬ Li Y Xꎬ et al.ꎬ 2026. Physiological  Zhao H Xꎬ Huang X Qꎬ Chen S Qꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. Response
              responses and saline ̄alkali tolerance evaluation of eight  analysis of microstructure of different rice varieties under
              ground ̄cover chrysanthemum lines to saline ̄alkali stress  alkali stress [ J ]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural
              [J]. Journal of Qingdao Agricultural University ( Natural  Universityꎬ 51(11): 11-22. [赵海新ꎬ 黄晓群ꎬ 陈书强ꎬ
              Science Edition)ꎬ 43(1): 17-26. [张昊ꎬ 苏柏宁ꎬ 黎彦       等ꎬ 2020. 碱胁迫下不同水稻品种微观结构响应解析
              希ꎬ 等ꎬ 2026. 8 个地被菊品系对盐碱胁迫的生理响应及                    [J]. 东北农业大学学报ꎬ 51(11): 11-22.]
              耐盐碱性评价 [J]. 青岛农业大学学报(自然科学版)ꎬ 43                  Zong Y Zꎬ Yang Qꎬ Chang C Cꎬ et al.ꎬ 2021. Effects of elevated
              (1):17-26.]                                        CO concentration on photosynthetic acclimation of winter
                                                                   2
            Zhang T Pꎬ Yang X Hꎬ 2017. Research on the mechanism of  wheat under drought condition [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied
              glycinebetaine regulating  plants  stress  resistance  and  Ecologyꎬ 32(12): 4370-4380. [宗毓铮ꎬ 杨琦ꎬ 常翠翠ꎬ 等ꎬ
              development [J]. Plant Physiology Journalꎬ 53(11): 1955-  2021. 大气 CO 浓度升高对干旱条件下冬小麦叶片光合适应
                                                                           2
              1962. [张天鹏ꎬ 杨兴洪ꎬ 2017. 甜菜碱提高植物抗逆性及                 的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报ꎬ 32(12): 4370-4380.]
              促进生长发育研究进展 [J]. 植物生理学报ꎬ 53(11):
              1955-1962.]                                                                   (责任编辑  周翠鸣)
   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123