Page 52 - 《广西植物》2025年第11期
P. 52

1 9 9 6                                广  西  植  物                                         45 卷























                  表示南美蟛蜞菊ꎻ         表示蟛蜞菊ꎮ ∗表示处理间差异显著(P<0.05)ꎮ
                  indicates S. trilobataꎻ  indicates S. calendulacea. ∗ indicates significant differences between different treatments (P<0.05).
                          图 5  外源脱落酸喷施对南美蟛蜞菊和蟛蜞菊克隆片段总生物量和根冠比的影响
             Fig. 5  Effects of ABA application on the total biomass and the root ̄shoot ratio of Sphagneticola trilobata and S. calendulacea



            整合导致南美蟛蜞菊生物量分配格局的差异可能                              D'HERTEFELDT Tꎬ JNSDTTIR IRSꎬ 1999. Extensive
            也是其克隆整合收益更大的原因之一ꎬ并有助于                                physiological integration in intact clonal systems of Carex
                                                                 arenaria [J]. Journal of Ecologyꎬ 87(2): 258-264.
            其成功入侵ꎮ
                                                               DE KROON Hꎬ FRANSEN Bꎬ VAN RHEENEN JWꎬ et al.ꎬ
                 综上所述ꎬ本研究表明外来入侵克隆植物及
                                                                 1996. High levels of inter ̄ramet water translocation in two
            其同属本地种胁迫信号的克隆整合差异可能是影
                                                                 rhizomatous Carex speciesꎬ as quantified by deuterium
            响其入侵性的重要因素ꎬ进一步推进了克隆生长
                                                                 labelling [J]. Oecologiaꎬ 106(1): 73-84.
            习性对外来植物入侵能力影响的认识ꎮ 然而ꎬ本                             DUAN SJꎬ DU Jꎬ YU DWꎬ et al.ꎬ 2024a. Clonal integration of
            文仅涉及一种外来入侵克隆植物及其同属本地                                 stress signal  induces  morphological  and  physiological
                                                                 response of root within clonal network [ J]. PLoS ONEꎬ
            种ꎬ未来仍需开展更多研究以验证结果的普适性ꎮ
                                                                 19(3): e0298258.
                                                               DUAN SJꎬ SUN GJꎬ DAN Yꎬ et al.ꎬ 2024b. Timing of systemic
            参考文献:                                                resistance induced by local exogenous ABA application within
                                                                 clonal network of stoloniferous herb Centella asiatica
            ALI Hꎬ SIDDIQUI Mꎬ AL ̄WHAIBI Mꎬ et al.ꎬ 2013. Effect of  subjected to low water availability [ J]. Frontiers in Plant
               proline and abscisic acid on the growth and physiological  Scienceꎬ 14: 1324460.
               performance of Faba bean under water stress [J]. Pakistan  GMEZ Sꎬ ONODA Yꎬ OSSIPOV Vꎬ et al.ꎬ 2008. Systemic
               Journal of Botanyꎬ 45(3): 933-940.                induced resistance: A risk ̄spreading strategy in clonal plant
            BERRIOS Lꎬ RENTSCH JDꎬ 2022. Linking reactive oxygen  networks? [J]. The New Phytologistꎬ 179(4): 1142-1153.
               species ( ROS) to abiotic and biotic feedbacks in plant  LATHA ASꎬ SREE KSSꎬ SUJATHAMMA Pꎬ 2023. Effect of
               microbiomes: The dose makes the poison [J]. International  abscisic acid on drought tolerance of selected plant species
               Journal of Molecular Sciencesꎬ 23(8): 4402.       [J]. Ecologyꎬ Environment and Conservationꎬ 29: 313-318.
            CAO Xꎬ SHEN QDꎬ MA Sꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. Physiological and PIP  LATIF Hꎬ 2014. Physiological responses of Pisum sativum plant
               transcriptional responses to progressive soil water deficit in  to exogenous ABA application under drought conditions
               three mulberry cultivars [ J]. Frontiers in Plant Scienceꎬ  [J]. Pakistan Journal of Botanyꎬ 46(3): 973-982.
               11: 1310.                                       LECHUGA ̄LAGO Yꎬ SIXTO ̄RUIZ Mꎬ ROILOA SRꎬ et al.ꎬ
            CHEN JSꎬ LEI NFꎬ LIU Qꎬ 2011. Defense signaling among  2015. Clonal integration facilitates the colonization of drought
               interconnected ramets of a rhizomatous clonal plantꎬ induced  environments by plant invaders [ J ]. AoB PLANTSꎬ
               by jasmonic ̄acid application [J]. Acta Oecologicaꎬ 37(4):  8: plw023.
               355-360.                                        LIANG JFꎬ YUAN WYꎬ GAO JQꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. Soil resource
   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57