Page 83 - 《广西植物》2026年第4期
P. 83
4 期 夏黎明等: 革叶猕猴桃休眠过程中生理变化与转录组分析 6 4 1
并且能够在较短的时间内实现有效的抗氧化保 players in plant stress signalling [ J ]. Journal of
护ꎬ帮助芽体更快地从休眠状态恢复生长( Brunner Experimental Botanyꎬ 65(5): 1229-1240.
et al.ꎬ 2014)ꎮ (4)本研究与落叶猕猴桃及其他果 BEAUVIEUX Rꎬ WENDEN Bꎬ DIRLEWANGER Eꎬ 2018. Bud
树休眠机制的异同ꎬ休眠解除的生态适应性ꎬ革叶 dormancy in perennial fruit tree species: a pivotal role for
oxidative cues [J]. Frontiers in Plant Scienceꎬ 9: 657.
猕猴桃的低需冷量特性使其能够在温暖冬季环境
BIELENBERG D Gꎬ WANG Yꎬ LI Zꎬ et al.ꎬ 2008. Sequencing
中维持较为稳定的生长周期ꎬ减少因寒冬不足带
and annotation of the evergrowing locus in peach [ Prunus
来的生产风险ꎮ 相比之下ꎬ落叶猕猴桃和其他高
persica ( L.) Batsch] reveals a cluster of six MADS ̄box
需冷量的果树品种则可能因低温不足而导致休眠
transcription factors as candidate genes for regulation of
解除延 迟 和 萌 芽 不 齐 等 问 题ꎬ 影 响 产 量 和 品 质 terminal bud formation [ J]. Tree Genetics & Genomesꎬ
(Wang et al.ꎬ 2020ꎻ Pan et al.ꎬ 2021ꎻ Ye et al.ꎬ 4(3): 495-507.
2022)ꎮ BRUNNER A Mꎬ EVANS L Mꎬ HSU C Yꎬ et al.ꎬ 2014.
通过以上对比ꎬ可以看出常绿猕猴桃在休眠 Vernalization and the chilling requirement to exit bud
机制上具有与落叶猕猴桃及其他果树显著的差 dormancy: shared or separate regulation? [J]. Frontiers in
异ꎮ 这些差异主要体现在需冷量、激素响应、抗氧 Plant Scienceꎬ 5: 732.
CAMPOY J Aꎬ RUIZ Dꎬ EGEA Jꎬ 2011. Dormancy in
化系统以及整体的生态适应性上ꎮ 这种差异正是
temperate fruit trees in a global warming context: a review
适应不同气候带( 温带-亚热带) 的遗传与生理基
[J]. Scientia Horticulturaeꎬ 130(2): 357-372.
础ꎬ革叶猕猴桃的低需冷量特性使其能够适应温
COOKE J E Kꎬ ERIKSSON M Eꎬ JUNTTILA Oꎬ 2012. The
暖冬季环境ꎬ进而在气候变暖的背景下具有重要
dynamic nature of bud dormancy in trees: environmental
的栽培潜力和育种价值ꎮ 这为在此基础上通过革 control and molecular mechanisms [ J ]. Plantꎬ Cell &
叶猕猴桃的遗传改良ꎬ解决全球气候变暖所带来 Environmentꎬ 35(10): 1707-1728.
的“低 冷 量 困 境” 提 供 了 理 论 依 据 和 实 践 指 导 DARBYSHIRE Rꎬ WEBB Lꎬ GOODWIN Iꎬ et al.ꎬ 2011.
(Nazir et al.ꎬ 2024ꎻAsadi et al.ꎬ 2024)ꎮ Winter chilling trends for deciduous fruit trees in Australia
[ J ]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorologyꎬ 151(8):
1074-1085.
参考文献: EREZ Aꎬ FISHMAN Sꎬ 1998. The dynamic model for chilling
evaluation in peach buds [ J]. Acta Horticulturaeꎬ 465:
ARC Eꎬ SECHET Jꎬ CORBINEAU Fꎬ 2013. ABA crosstalk 507-510.
with ethylene and nitric oxide in seed dormancy and EREZ Aꎬ LAVEE Sꎬ 1971. The effect of climatic conditions on
germination [J]. Frontiers in Plant Scienceꎬ 4: 63. dormancy development of peach buds. I. temperature
ARORA Rꎬ ROWLAND L Jꎬ TANINO Kꎬ 2003. Induction and [ J ]. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural
release of bud dormancy in woody perennials: a science Scienceꎬ 96(6): 711-714.
comes of age [J]. HortScienceꎬ 38(5): 911-921. FALAVIGNA V Sꎬ GUITTON Bꎬ COSTES Eꎬ et al.ꎬ 2019. I
ASADI Mꎬ GHASEMNEZHAD Mꎬ BAKHSHIPOUR Aꎬ et al.ꎬ want to (bud) break free: the potential role of DAM and
2024. Breeding of new kiwifruit ( Actinidia chinensis ) SVP ̄like genes in regulating dormancy cycle in temperate
cultivars with yellow ( golden ) fleshed and superior fruit trees [J]. Frontiers in Plant Scienceꎬ 9: 1990.
characteristics [J]. BMC Plant Biologyꎬ 24(1): 1045. FAUST Mꎬ EREZ Aꎬ ROWLAND L Jꎬ et al.ꎬ 1997. Bud
ATKINSON C Jꎬ BRENNAN R Mꎬ JONES H Gꎬ 2013. dormancy in perennial fruit trees: physiological basis for
Declining chilling and its impact on temperate perennial dormancy inductionꎬ maintenanceꎬ and release [ J ].
crops [ J]. Environmental and Experimental Botanyꎬ 91: HortScienceꎬ 32(4): 623-629.
48-62. HANLEY Zꎬ 2018. Kiwifruit (Actinidia spp.) breeding [M] / /
BARBA ̄ESPÍN Gꎬ HERNÁNDEZ J Aꎬ DÍAZ ̄VIVANCOS Pꎬ AL ̄KHAYRI Jꎬ JAIN Sꎬ JOHNSON D. Advances in plant
2022. Antioxidant system: The hub of bud dormancy breeding strategies: Fruits. Vol. 3. Cham: Springer
regulation in Prunus sp. [ J ]. Scientia Horticulturaeꎬ International Publishing: 377-401.
305: 111396. HOWE G Tꎬ HORVATH D Pꎬ DHARMAWARDHANA Pꎬ et
BAXTER Aꎬ MITTLER Rꎬ SUZUKI Nꎬ 2014. ROS as key al.ꎬ 2015. Extensive transcriptome chanes during natural

