Page 170 - 《广西植物》2023年第12期
P. 170
2 3 3 6 广 西 植 物 43 卷
秀梅ꎬ 朱红林ꎬ 李小靖ꎬ 等ꎬ 2010. 盐胁迫对水稻幼苗生
4 结论 长及生 理 生 化 的 影 响 [ J]. 广 东 农 业 科 学ꎬ 37(4):
19-21.]
GAO JFꎬ 2006. Experimental guidance for plant physiology
盐胁迫下ꎬ两个水稻材料体内活性氧、丙二醛 [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press: 140-231. [高俊凤ꎬ
2006. 植物生理学实验指导 [M]. 北京: 高等教育出版
含量增加ꎬ氧化胁迫造成代谢紊乱ꎻ同时ꎬ渗透胁迫
社: 140-231.]
造成生理干旱ꎬ使得植株吸水困难ꎬ生长受阻ꎬ使得 GU Xꎬ 2019. Evaluation index system of salt tolerance of rice
株高和假茎宽减小ꎮ 然而两个水稻材料应答盐胁 and comprehensive evaluation of salt tolerance [D]. Haikou:
Hainan University. [顾骁ꎬ 2019. 水稻耐盐性评价指标体
迫的生理效应存在差异ꎬHD96 ̄1 具有更强的抗氧化
系及耐盐性综合评价 [D]. 海口: 海南大学.]
和渗透调节能力ꎬ可有效缓解盐胁迫带来的不利影 HELLOU Jꎬ ROSS NWꎬ MOON TWꎬ 2012. Glutathioneꎬ
glutathione S ̄transferaseꎬ and glutathione conjugatesꎬ
响ꎬ使得生长发育受抑制程度小于 93 ̄11ꎮ
complementary markers of oxidative stress in aquatic biota
[J]. Environ Sci Pollut Resꎬ 19(6): 2007-2023.
HU WCꎬ 2017. Regulatory effects of combined application of
参考文献: SAꎬ proline and GABA on the antioxidant system of rice
under salt stress [ D ]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural
University. [胡文成ꎬ 2017. 水杨酸、脯氨酸、 γ ̄氨基丁酸
BHATT Tꎬ SHARMA Aꎬ PURI Sꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. Salt tolerance
对盐胁迫下水稻抗氧化系统的调控效应 [D]. 哈尔滨:
mechanisms and approaches: Future scope of halotolerant
东北农业大学.]
genes and rice landraces [J]. Rice Sciꎬ 27(5): 368-383.
HUANG Jꎬ BAI ZGꎬ ZHONG Cꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. Physiological
BOSE Jꎬ RODRIGO ̄MORENO Aꎬ SHABALA Sꎬ 2014. ROS
and molecular mechanisms of salt stress tolerance in rice
homeostasis in halophytes in the context of salinity stress
[J]. J Nucl Agric Sciꎬ 34(6): 1359-1367. [黄洁ꎬ 白志
tolerance [J]. J Exp Botꎬ 65(5): 1241-1257.
刚ꎬ 钟楚ꎬ 等ꎬ 2020. 水稻耐盐生理 及 分 子 调 节 机 制
CHAWLA Sꎬ JAIN Sꎬ JAIN Vꎬ 2013. Salinity induced oxidative
[J]. 核农学报ꎬ 34(6): 1359-1367.]
stress and antioxidant system in salt ̄tolerant and salt ̄
JING Cꎬ BO ECꎬ SIRIA Nꎬ et al.ꎬ 2019. Morphological and
sensitive cultivars of rice ( Oryza sativa L.) [ J]. J Plant
metabolic responses to salt stress of rice (Oryza sativa L.)
Biochem Biotꎬ 22(1): 27-34.
materials which differ in salinity tolerance [J]. Plant Physiol
CHEN HZꎬ NATALIA Lꎬ ZHU DFꎬ et al.ꎬ 2007. Absorption
Biochemꎬ 144: 427-435.
+ +
and distribution of Na and K in rice seedling under salt
KOBAYASHI NIꎬ YAMAJI Nꎬ YAMAMOTO Hꎬ et al.ꎬ
stress [J]. Chin J Plant Ecolꎬ 31(5): 937-945. [陈惠哲ꎬ 2017. OsHKT1ꎻ5 mediates Na exclusion in the vasculature
+
Natalia Ladatkoꎬ 朱德峰ꎬ 等ꎬ 2007. 盐胁迫下水稻苗期
to protect leaf blades and reproductive tissues from salt
Na 和 K 吸收与分配规律的初步研究 [J]. 植物生态学
+
+
toxicity in rice [J]. Plant Jꎬ 91(4): 657-670.
报ꎬ 31(5): 937-945.]
KORDROSTAMI Mꎬ RABIEI Bꎬ KUMLEH HHꎬ 2016.
CHEN JXꎬ WANG XFꎬ 2006. Experimental guidance in plant
Association analysisꎬ genetic diversity and haplotyping of
physiology [ M]. Guangzhou: South China University of
rice plants under salt stress using SSR markers linked to
Technology Press: 54-127. [陈建勋ꎬ 王晓峰ꎬ 2006. 植物
SalTol and morpho ̄physiological characteristics [ J]. Plant
生理学实验指导 [M]. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社:
Syst Evolꎬ 302 (7): 871-890.
54-127.]
KUMAR Sꎬ ASIF MHꎬ CHAKRABARTY Dꎬ et al.ꎬ 2013.
CHEN RSꎬ CHENG YFꎬ HAN SYꎬ et al.ꎬ 2017. Whole genome
Differential expression of rice lambda class GST gene family
sequencing and comparative transcriptome analysis of a novel members during plant growthꎬ developmentꎬ and in response
seawater adaptedꎬ salt ̄resistant rice cultivar ̄sea rice 86
to stress conditions [ J]. Plant Mol Biol Repꎬ 31(3):
[J]. BMC Genomꎬ 18(1): 655. 569-580.
CHUAMNAKTHONG Sꎬ NAMPEI Mꎬ UEDA Aꎬ 2019.
LI Qꎬ YANG Aꎬ ZHANG WHꎬ 2017. Comparative studies on
+
Characterization of Na exclusion mechanism in rice under tolerance of rice genotypes differing in their tolerance to
saline ̄alkaline stress conditions [ J ]. Plant Sciꎬ moderate salt stress [J]. BMC Plant Biolꎬ 17(1): 1-13.
287: 110171. LIMA ̄MELO Yꎬ CARVALHO FELꎬ MARTINS MOꎬ et al.ꎬ
DE OLLAS Cꎬ ARBONA Vꎬ GÓMEZ ̄CADENAS Aꎬ 2015. 2016. Mitochondrial GPX1 silencing triggers differential
Jasmonic acid interacts with abscisic acid to regulate plant photosynthesis impairment in response to salinity in rice
responses to water stress conditions [J]. Plant Signal Behavꎬ plants [J]. J Integr Plant Biolꎬ 58(8): 737-748.
10(12): e1078953. LIN Bꎬ ZHAO BHꎬ 2022. Research advances of physiological
E ZGꎬ ZHANG LJꎬ 2010. Molecular mechanism of rice mechanism and genetic improvement in salt and alkali
responses to salt stress [J]. Hybridomaꎬ 25(2): 1-5. [鄂 tolerance of rice [ J]. Jiangsu Agric Sciꎬ 50 ( 16): 37 -
志国ꎬ 张 丽 靖ꎬ 2010. 水 稻 盐 胁 迫 应 答 的 分 子 机 制 43. [林兵ꎬ 赵步洪ꎬ 2022. 水稻耐盐碱生理机制与遗传改
[J]. 杂交水稻ꎬ 25(2): 1-5.] 良的研究进展 [J]. 江苏农业科学ꎬ 50(16): 37-43.]
FU XMꎬ ZHU HLꎬ LI XJꎬ et al.ꎬ 2010. Effects of NaCl stress LU NNꎬ YAN LHꎬ ZHENG CKꎬ et al.ꎬ 2017. Effects of salt
on the growth and physio ̄biochemical characteristics of rice stress on growth and agronomic traits of Yanfeng 47 and
seedlings [J]. Guangdong Agric Sciꎬ 37 (4): 19-21. [符 Yanjing 456 [J]. Cropsꎬ 33(5): 106-111. [卢楠楠ꎬ 闫丽