Page 33 - 《广西植物》2026年第9期
P. 33

9 期                   李佳等: 丽江云杉叶绿体基因组序列特征及系统发育分析                                          1 4 6 9

              organization  and  analysis  of  sequence  data  [ J ].  Nguyen L Tꎬ Schmidt H Aꎬ von Haeseler Aꎬ et al.ꎬ 2015. IQ ̄
              Bioinformaticsꎬ 28(12): 1647-1649.                 TREE: A fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating
            Lanfear Rꎬ Frandsen P Bꎬ Wright A Mꎬ et al.ꎬ 2017.   maximum ̄likelihood phylogenies [J]. Molecular Biology and
              PartitionFinder2: New methods for selecting partitioned  Evolutionꎬ 32(1): 268-274.
              models of evolution for  molecular  and morphological  Palmer J Dꎬ Herbon L Aꎬ 1988. Plant mitochondrial DNA
              phylogenetic analyses [J]. Molecular Biology and Evolutionꎬ  evolved rapidly in structureꎬ but slowly in sequence [ J].
              34(3): 772-773.                                    Journal of Molecular Evolutionꎬ 28(1): 87-97.
            Letunic Iꎬ Bork Pꎬ 2007. Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL): an  Palmer J Dꎬ Thompson W Fꎬ 1982. Chloroplast DNA
              online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation  rearrangements are more frequent when a large inverted repeat
              [J]. Bioinformaticsꎬ 23(1): 127-128.               sequence is lost [J]. Cellꎬ 29(2): 537-550.
            Li Bꎬ Su X Pꎬ Liu Cꎬ et al.ꎬ 2025. Chloroplast genome  Pan Y Lꎬ Zhang L Nꎬ Gong H Dꎬ 2024. Effects of fertilization
              characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of Scrophulariaceae  with different proportion of nitrogenꎬ phosphorus and
              [J]. Biotechnology Bulletinꎬ 41(3): 240-254. [李斌ꎬ 苏香  potassium on physiology growth of Picea likiangensis
              萍ꎬ 刘畅ꎬ 等ꎬ 2025. 玄参科植物叶绿体基因组特征及系                    seedlings [J]. Journal of Southwest Forestry Universityꎬ 44
              统发育分析 [J]. 生物技术通报ꎬ 41(3): 240-254.]                (4): 27-33. [潘彦丽ꎬ 张零念ꎬ 巩合德ꎬ 2024. 氮磷钾
            Li Jꎬ Wang Rꎬ Han L Mꎬ et al.ꎬ 2024. Chloroplast genome  不同配比对丽江云杉幼苗生理生长的影响 [J]. 西南林
              characteristics and phylogenetic analysis of Tsuga forrestii  业大学学报ꎬ 44(4): 27-33.]
              Downie and Tsuga dumosa Eichler [ J ]. Plant Science  Park Sꎬ Kwak Mꎬ Park S Jꎬ 2024. Complete organelle genomes
              Journalꎬ 43(3): 292 - 302. [ 李佳ꎬ 王茹ꎬ 韩立敏ꎬ 等ꎬ       of Korean firꎬ Abies koreana and phylogenomics of the
              2024. 丽江铁杉和云南铁杉叶绿体基因组序列特征及系统                       gymnosperm genus Abies using nuclear and cytoplasmic DNA
              发育分析 [J]. 植物科学学报ꎬ 43(3): 292-302.]                 sequence data [J]. Scientific Reportsꎬ 14: 7636.
            Li J Fꎬ Xu Bꎬ Yang Qꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. The complete chloroplast  Parmar Rꎬ Cattonaro Fꎬ Phillips Cꎬ et al.ꎬ 2022. Assembly and
              genome sequence of Picea schrenkiana ( Pinaceae) [ J].  annotation of red spruce (Picea rubens) chloroplast genomeꎬ
              Mitochondrial DNA Part Bꎬ 5(3): 2191-2192.         identification of simple sequence repeatsꎬ and phylogenetic
            Li Lꎬ 2013. Population genetics and intraspecific divergence of  analysis in Picea [ J]. International Journal of Molecular
              Picea likiangensis  complex  [ D ].  Lanzhou: Lanzhou  Sciencesꎬ 23(23): 15243.
              University. [李龙ꎬ 2013. 丽江云杉复合体群体遗传学与种            Peden Jꎬ 2005. CodonW version 1.4.2 [CP]. Nottinghamꎬ UK:
              内分化研究 [D]. 兰州: 兰州大学.]                              University of Nottingham.
            Li X Wꎬ Yang Yꎬ Henry R Jꎬ et al.ꎬ 2015. Plant DNA  Peng X Lꎬ Wu W Zꎬ 2011. Genetic variation and phylogeography
              barcoding: from gene to genome [J]. Biological Reviews of  of Picea likiangensis inferred from RAPD markers [J]. Bulletin
              the Cambridge Philosophical Societyꎬ 90(1): 157-166.  of Botanical Researchꎬ 31(4): 436-442. [彭晓莉ꎬ 吴旺泽ꎬ
            Lin Y Eꎬ Wu C Sꎬ Wu Y Wꎬ et al.ꎬ 2025. Phylogenomic  2011. 基于 RAPD 标记的丽江云杉遗传多样性及谱系地理
              inference suggests differential deep time phylogenetic signals  [J]. 植物研究ꎬ 31(4): 436-442.]
              from nuclear and organellar genomes in gymnosperms  Qu X Jꎬ Moore M Jꎬ Li D Zꎬ et al.ꎬ 2019. PGA: a software
              [J]. Plantsꎬ 14(9): 1335.                          package for rapidꎬ accurateꎬ and flexible batch annotation of
            Liu Qꎬ 2004. Effects of gap size and with in gap position on the  plastomes [J]. Plant Methodsꎬ 15(1): 50.
              survival and growth of naturally regenerated Picea likiangensis  Ran J Hꎬ Wei X Xꎬ Wang X Qꎬ 2006. Molecular phylogeny
              seedlings [ J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Environmental  and biogeography of Picea ( Pinaceae): Implications for
              Biologyꎬ 10(3): 281-285.                           phylogeographical studies using cytoplasmic haplotypes
            Lo Tꎬ Coombe Lꎬ Gagalova K Kꎬ et al.ꎬ 2024. Assembly and  [ J ]. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolutionꎬ 41(2):
              annotation of the black spruce genome provide insights on  405-419.
              spruce phylogeny and evolution of stress response [J]. G3:  Ranade S Sꎬ Garcia ̄Gil M Rꎬ Rosselló J Aꎬ 2016. Non ̄functional
              Genesꎬ Genomesꎬ Geneticsꎬ 14(1): jkad247.          plastid ndh gene fragments are present in the nuclear genome of
            Lo Tꎬ Coombe Lꎬ Lin Dꎬ et al.ꎬ 2020. Complete chloroplast  Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karsch): insights from in silico
              genome sequence of a black spruce (Picea mariana) from  analysis of nuclear and organellar genomes [ J]. Molecular
              Eastern Canada [J]. Microbiology Resource Announcementsꎬ  Genetics & Genomicsꎬ 291(2): 935-941.
              9(39): e00877-20.                                Ronquist Fꎬ Teslenko Mꎬ van der Mark Pꎬ et al.ꎬ 2012.
            Lockwood J Dꎬ Aleksic ' J Mꎬ Zou J Bꎬ et al.ꎬ 2013. A new  MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and
              phylogeny for the genus Picea from plastidꎬ mitochondrialꎬ  model choice across a large model space [ J]. Systematic
              and nuclear sequences [ J]. Molecular Phylogenetics and  Biologyꎬ 61(3): 539-542.
              Evolutionꎬ 69(3): 717-727.                       Ru D Fꎬ Sun Y Sꎬ Wang D Lꎬ et al.ꎬ 2018. Population genomic
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38